What I found is somewhat surprising, not that it means much. The games still have to be played.
Based on the 40 man roster, the expected win total of pitchers was 65.57143. Essentially 65 or 66 wins. But that wasn't good enough for my readers, so I set a likely 25 man roster and reran the numbers.
The roster I set as the 25 man roster is as follows with 2007 ZIPS Projected BA:
Name | P | Age | AVG |
Jason Bay | lf | 28 | 0.279 |
Xavier Nady | rf | 28 | 0.280 |
Freddy Sanchez | 3b | 29 | 0.306 |
Jose Bautista | cf | 26 | 0.255 |
Ryan Doumit# | c | 26 | 0.252 |
Jody Gerut* | rf | 29 | 0.254 |
Nate McLouth* | cf | 25 | 0.267 |
Chris Duffy* | cf | 27 | 0.274 |
Ronny Paulino | c | 26 | 0.272 |
Jack Wilson | ss | 29 | 0.270 |
Jose Castillo | 2b | 26 | 0.256 |
Brad Eldred | 1b | 26 | 0.223 |
* - Left Handed Hitter
# - Switch Hitter
Name | Age | ERA |
Mike Gonzalez* | 29 | 2.45 |
Salomon Torres | 35 | 3.44 |
Matt Capps | 23 | 3.87 |
Zach Duke* | 24 | 3.92 |
Damaso Marte* | 32 | 3.97 |
Tom Gorzelanny* | 24 | 4.06 |
Josh Sharpless | 26 | 4.11 |
John Grabow* | 28 | 4.23 |
Ian Snell | 25 | 4.53 |
Paul Maholm* | 25 | 4.63 |
Victor Santos | 30 | 5.08 |
Shawn Chacon | 29 | 5.50 |
* - Left Handed
A comparison of 2006 Team Stats to the 2007 ZIPS 25 Man Projection are as follows:
Team Batting:
Season | AVG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI |
2007 Projected | 0.269 | 5079 | 693 | 1364 | 299 | 23 | 151 | 601 |
2006 Actual | 0.263 | 5558 | 691 | 1462 | 286 | 17 | 141 | 656 |
Looking at the numbers as team batting, there were fewer at bats by nearly 500 at bats.
Here are the adjusted batting stats so comparable at bats are used between Actual and Projected:
Season | AVG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI |
2007 Adjusted | 0.269 | 5558 | 758 | 1493 | 327 | 25 | 165 | 658 |
2006 Actual | 0.263 | 5558 | 691 | 1462 | 286 | 17 | 141 | 656 |
Looking at adjusted stats, as it stands the team is expected to improve. Runs will be up considerably as well as most other stats except RBI. I guess we play a lot of poor defensive teams?
The stats I found most amazing was the pitching, most notably the win loss record.
Team Pitching:
Season | W | L | GS | INN | BB | K |
2007 Projected | 76 | 76 | 156 | 1359 | 518 | 975 |
2006 Actual | 67 | 95 | 162 | 1435 | 620 | 1060 |
Once again an adjustment needs to be made to have similar innings pitched.
Season | W | L | GS | INN | BB | K |
2006 Actual | 67 | 95 | 162 | 1435 | 620 | 1060 |
2007 Adjusted | 80.3 | 80.3 | 165 | 1435 | 547 | 1030 |
Based on the ZIPS projection, and the health of the staff, the Pirates will finally have a non-losing season. Walks will be down considerably. Strikeouts will also drop. The team ERA is projected to improve as well. The 2007 ZIPS projection is 4.26. In 2006 the team ERA was 4.55.
Luckily the team has picked up 3 starts. Maybe that means they win a wild card spot and get swept in the playoffs?
What does this all mean? I think it means a computer is impressed enough with the team that it expects a dramatic improvement in the team. Unfortunately I am not as optimistic. At least according to paper /computer we are a .500 team!!
3 comments:
Dave:
You are one sick unit! Lots of work there. Much appreciated... Best of luck in this Bloggery stuff. It looks great!
Will bookmark this site. You know, never know, might find some good fodder for an item...
Best of luck
Magoo
Thanks Magoo. Hopefully you be a regular submitter to the comments. I hope you don't mind me adding a link to your site.
Dave You're on the ball. I'll poke my nose into a few here and there!
As for the link not at all... I'll get around to getting one on there for this coll spot!
Post a Comment